Join our WikiEducator discussion group or Register now for free skills training.

View source

From WikiEducator

Jump to: navigation, search

[Add header]


Sorting order:
Start a new discussion

Portal navigation (1)

There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 14 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.

You do not have permission to edit pages, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

Return to WikiEducator talk:Quality Assurance Framework.

I agree. I do think these headings are relevant at the begining stages of this initiative... But should be reworked as the QA matures...

Hi Peter,

I agree these are relevant in the beginning phases -- I just sense that they are subheadings of the main structure -- if you know what I mean ...

Thinking about this from an information design perspective, we have three key areas:

  • Content
    • First drafts
    • Featured works
    • Peer reviewed OER
  • Capability -- i.e. the capability of individuals and organisations to produce quality OER
    • eMM
  • How we do it -- i.e. process and supporting materials on how to do this
    • Tutorials
    • Tools, e.g. the templates we'll use for requesting review as a featured item etc.
    • Policies
    • Community
    • Contribution levels

Research is a cross-cutter --- need to think where this fits into the strucuture

What do you think?

I think I will try and work these chnages into the portal's menu template...

Unlicensed content being uploaded to WE (1)

There have been no changes to this discussion for at least 14 days. If it is concluded, you may want to write a summary.

Hi Peter, has the issues that James Neill brought up a week or so ago around the copyright on files that have been uploaded to wikied been included in the Quality Assurance Framework?

Yes,

http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_and_Review/Featured_learning_resource#Criteria



Every day that goes by the more I dislike LQT... I just stumbled upon > 20 messages form two weeks back... I don't know why I didn't get any information (email, prompts in my watch list...) regarding them. I think LQT is damaging to the collaboration within WE.

When is turning LQT off going to be tabled to the new council? Or how could we at least force it onto it's own tab? And could these requests be made without Erik being a stakeholder?

Cheers,