Thread:End of project review (4)

There is a lot of functionality here!
 * needs more explanation of the overall ideas about peer evaluation and functionality provided
 * start with some simpler examples first
 * explain actual coding notation - looks like comments, some are actually control parameters, difference between questions and grading criteria
 * code readability - where does spacing matter, blank lines, actual comments
 * roll-up of levels is complex and needs further explanation

Is there more information about the results of the peer evaluations for the instructor?